Focal Clear review: Hotly-contested ‘affordable high-end’ middle ground

Focal Clear review – Focal’s latest luxo-headphone slots in between the Elear and Utopia models, in the hotly-contested ‘affordable high-end’ middle ground

Review: Ken Kessler. Lab: Keith Howard

If I have learned anything about committing one’s thoughts to print, it is Never Make Predictions. They will invariably be wrong and will come back to haunt you. I am thus unwilling to hazard a guess as to the longevity of the boom in headphone sales and usage. As long as it continues, however, in the best ’make hay while the sun shines’ manner. Focal is covering all its bases. The latest to join its high-end family is the Clear, between the dearer Utopia and less costly Elear.

Focal Clear review

Focal Clear review: FOCAL’S OPENNESS

Focal’s Clear is a departure from my preferred cans. For the past 30-plus years, since I heard my first pair of Stax electrostatics. I have favored planar types over dynamic drivers. Despite this bias, now served by Audeze LCD-Xs. I have a deep and abiding respect for a number of B&Ws. Beyers and AKGs. and the Clear’s less expensive predecessors. What keeps me wedded to planars is an openness and an out-of-the- head sensation that eludes other designs, whether sealed or open-back, and a sense of the treble’s transient speed.

Blessedly, the Clear emulated planars to a greater degree than I expected when it comes to openness, if not quite begging the need for forthcoming processors that promise unbridled openness – but I’ll get to the sound in a bit. More important is justifying the price when there are stunning headphones on the market. What Focal is pursuing – like its Gallic cousins at Devialet – is something beyond mere audiophile acceptance.

Everything about the Clear suggests that someone at Focal has a subscription to one or more of the various guides that suggest how the affluent might spend their spare cash. So. the packaging is exemplary in the Apple manner (a trick

Bowers & Wilkins discovered years ago), and Focal has gone the extra kilometer by providing a superlative, padded carry- case. It is form-fitted to withstand being crammed into hand luggage and has space for the three types of interconnect cables supplied, meeting all needs.

Focal generously equips the Clear with a 1.2m set for use with a portable device, with a 1/4in jack convertible to a 3.5mm mini-jack. 3m with 1/4in- only jack and 3m balanced cable. The cables attach with a separate L/R 3.5mm mono plug into the bottom of each cup. so take note if you wish to experiment with aftermarket cables.

Focal Clear review: NOT FOR STREET

This need to provide suitability for portable use baffles me. despite my seeing on every urban street, in every Tube journey, on any airplane, countless people travelling or walking

Focal Clear review: VALVE-LIKE LUSHNESS

Close listening involved Musical Fidelity’s M1 SDAC. the golden skull-shaped Metaxas Marquis ‘Memento Mori’ and Quad PA-One

Focal Clear review

RIGHT: 100x90mm circumaural cups fully enclose the ear. but the open-back design precludes isolation from external sounds in favor of an out-of-head acoustic spread

Hey, anything that obviates a migraine is OK in my book

or jogging with headphones that can only be described as ’massive’. I have no problem with the Princess Leia look, but I do find cumbersome cans to be an irritant outside of the home or listening room. As far as my own usage goes.

I have (as do most of us. I suppose) two basic headphone needs: serious listening in the home and convenience usage on the go. For the latter, criteria such as size, weight, noise- cancellation and other concerns trump sheer sound quality.

For some time now. I have used only the AKG N60NCs during train journeys and flights. But markets often force a one-size-fits-all qualifier rather than the far more sensible – but ultimately costlier – horses- for-courses approach. The latter costs more because most people would rather buy one pair of headphones that do everything, rather than two: one for in-house ’serious’ listening and one for in-transit pleasure.

That said. I have yet to find any that can fill both sets of requirements, unless one follows the ear-buds path with its inescapable hygiene issues, the effects of added pressure on eardrums with tightly- fitted buds, the ease of losing them, and the sound leakage that makes it utter hell if you’re sitting next to some part-deaf millennial on a train, etc.

For me. the sheer bulk of the Clear precludes it from use in transit so I judged it solely by the criteria of an audiophile listening in the home. Dutifully, however.

I also used them with both a Huawei 10 phone and Pioneer XDP-100R digital player to confirm that both could provide satisfactory levels, which they did. Still.

I wonder who would leave home wearing’s worth of light-grey, easily-scarred luxo-cans…

LEFT: Soft, padded dove-grey leather is all that touches your noggin and ears, the sumptuous material lining the adjustable, comfy headband and ear cups, belying its 450g weight. However, it may prove tricky to keep clean

headphone amplifiers. Such is the transparency of the Clear that the differences in these various feeds were easily discernible, the best match in terms of overall balance being the Marquis, though the Clear certainly exploited the added warmth of the Quad PA-One’s valves.

This exposed the one curious behavioural element of the Clear, for even with the solid-state units the sound had a lushness that might easily be attributable to valve amps of the old school. The Quad PA-One added a level of warmth at the cost of a touch of transparency that thickened the sound, which was evident on vocals.

I was listening to Gregg Allman’s poignant, prescient swan-song Southern Blood [Rounder 1166100054) via my Marantz CD12/DA12, and both his vocals and the brass – check out ‘Going Going Gone’, which is inescapably eerie considering his demise last May – changed in this manner, but subjectivity allows you to prefer either/or. Swapping

between headphone amps delineated this phenomenon with enough conviction to suggest that anyone shopping for Clears (or any headphones for that matter) really must try them with the headphone amplifier or player with which they will be spending the bulk of their lives.

Amusingly, actual power was not an issue with any of the devices, whether a beefy headphone amp or a mobile phone or player – but then I have only ever found one pair of headphones in a half-century of listening that did challenge a ‘Ain socket, the DT48 ’cult’ pro model from Beyer.

As KH’s Lab Report indicates [see p63], the Clears are less sensitive than their siblings, but they are still easy to drive. At no point did I have to crank up any of the headphone amps or portable devices to attain levels beyond what I consider to be sane or comfortable.

Focal Clear review: EXTENDED LOW END

What especially I loved about the Clear is its bottom end. perfectly proportioned, extended, solid and dry in the same album’s heartbreaking cover of Lowell George’s ’Willin’’. I was gutted by the loss of Allman before Southern Blood arrived, but the intimacy imparted by the Clear begged for close listening.

As with other Focal headphones I’ve used, the Clears fall into the smooth-and- silky quadrant of one’s Venn diagram.

It’s apparent even with raucous material, such as The Motors’ ‘Dancing The Night Away’ from The Motors – The Virgin Years box set [Caroline CAROLR010CD]. After a jangly, twangy intro, in come power chords, pounding drums and an intensity in the vocals that suggests strained jugulars. The Clears keep it all together, widely spreading the sound at 1m 36s to show you how it can exist outside the head.

No. these do not obviate the need for planars if that’s more important to you than. say. midband neutrality.

WHY A ‘W’?

As in the Utopia and Elear, the Clear’s drive unit has a diaphragm which, across a diameter, has a cross-section resembling a W, only the middle part isn’t pointed but curved like a dome tweeter. Why this shape? The first thing to appreciate is that Focal’s drive unit is like a miniature loudspeaker driver, with a roll surround, unlike typical headphone drivers. The latter typically have a central dome surrounded by an annulus of the same material which both radiates a substantial fraction of the overall sound energy while acting as a flexible connection to the driver chassis. So the diaphragm is not as stiff as possible and prone to breakup resonances. Whereas, because of its roll surround, the entire Focal diaphragm can be stiff, the central dome and annular cone being dimensioned so that each has its first breakup mode at about the same frequency. KH

RIGHT: Despite reservations about portability. Focal’s Clear comes with one of the best fitted cases yet for cans – ideal for storage at home too

and these will never be mistaken for a pair of Stax Lambdas. And some might find the warm ’n’ fuzzy nature, applied to something as feverish as The Motors’ debut LP’s opener, a touch ironic. This post-punk (actually, that’s a bit of an insult: there wasn’t a single band in the entire punk canon with the musical chops of these former pub- rockers) frenzy ought to rip the top of your head off.

Focal Clear review: A MORE-ISH SET

Via the Focal Clears, the hard edge is slightly muted, but. hey. anything that fends off the arrival of a migraine is OK in my book.

The details weren’t compromised, the attack was still crisp – only the nasties were controlled. This is a truly more-ish set of cans.

And what happened with something so velvety that you could use it to put babies to sleep? Luck or timing provided me with a copy of True Faith, a freebie CD from Mojo, with The Staples Singers’ heart-stopping version of ‘Will The Circle Be Unbroken’ in glorious mono. Aside from demonstrating the dead-centre balance of the Clears, it allowed one to focus on massed voices without the spatial separation provided by stereo.

This is a fun test to try. lest you think mono has no value. I am not telling you how many Staples there are behind Pops, but the Clears let you hear each one. Ditto for the same CD’s equally breathtaking inclusion. The Orioles’ ‘Crying In The Chapel’. Sure. Elvis absolutely killed this, making it his own. but this deep gospel version almost makes me see the light. Every voice blended perfectly, but the keen ear was able to home in on each one of them.

Then there’s BB King’s contribution. People forget he mastered every genre beyond the blues that he chose to address, from jazz to funk. In full-on gospel mode, with rich Hammond organ stage left, he delivered ’Take My Hand Precious Lord’. Recorded in 1960, it has a minimalist arrangement of just drums, organ, piano and bass. The listener is regaled with a flood of emotion of such sincerity and intensity that one can only count the days until one’s next confession, or whatever other mode of salvation suits your soul.

How good. then, are the Focal Clears? This good: half-way through the BB King track, I instantly logged on to amazon.co.uk to buy 2006’s BB King Sings Spirituals.

Focal Clear review: VERDICT

Luxurious and fatigue-free in both sound and comfort. Focal’s Clear offers a fine balance between purist requirements, real-world considerations and a desire for something posh. It is one of the better dynamic models I’ve heard for offering sound freed from the cranium, while the lack of nasties – allied to those wonderful cushions – means that you can indulge in marathon listening sessions. Classy, too!

Sound Quality
86
LAB REPORT

FOCAL CLEAR Review

In broad brush terms the Clear performs a lot like its siblings, the Elear and Utopia. In respect of sensitivity, bass extension, distortion and frequency response it is part of the family rather than a loner. But there are detail differences, of course. All three headphones have a sensitivity that’s a little lower than typical today, but account for this by having somewhat higher impedance. The Clear has the lowest minimum impedance of the three and also the lowest sensitivity, but 59.2ohm is still high for a medium-impedance headphone and 112.8dB SPL for 1V sufficiently generous for very high sound pressure levels to be achieved with most worthy partnering devices. Still, the Clear manifestly has significantly lower current sensitivity than either the Elear or Utopia.

Because of the large range of the Clear’s impedance, which tops out at 320ohm at the 51 Hz bass resonance, frequency response modification due to the finite source impedance of a partnering headphone preamp is higher than normal at 1,09dB for a 10ohm source and 2.78dB for 30ohm – enough to cause perceptible changes in tonal balance. Talking of which, the Clear’s uncorrected frequency responses [Graph 1. below] show, in common with the Elear and Utopia, an extended bass coupled with less ‘peaking’ at 2-3kHz than is conventionally considered necessary to achieve a neutral perceived tonal balance.

Not pictured here, the CSD waterfall shows the peaks at about 6kHz and 8kHz on the response trace are associated with (driver) resonances. The third-octave corrected responses [see Graph 2. below] show only a mild rise in the upper bass but the expected trough the presence band. The 100Hz peak is a little less than the Elear’s. a little more than the Utopia’s, and the presence band shelf-down splits that of the other models too. being larger than the Utopia’s but less pronounced than the Elear’s. particularly at 4-5kHz. KH

ABOVE: Unequalised responses (L/R. grey/red; ave. 3rd-octave, black) show an extended bass and an unexaggerated presence. Note peaks at 6-8kHz

ABOVE: Third-octave freq. resp. (red = Harman corrected: cyan = FF corrected: green = DF corrected)

FOCAL CLEAR Review: Specifications

Sensitivity (SPL at 1 kHz for 1Vrms input)

112.8d8

Impedance modulus min/max (20Hz-20kHz)

59.2ohm @ 1.1kHz 320ohm @ 51Hz

Capsule matching (40Hz-10kHz)

±6.3dB

LF extension (-6dB ret 200Hz)

<20 Hz

Distortion 100Hz/1kHz (for 90dB SPL)

0.1% / <0.1%

Weight (inc cable and 0.25in connector)

492g

Focal - Clear Headphones

Free shipping
Last update was in: 2019-07-17 11:30 pm

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

      Leave a reply